On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever format > you choose. Not 1.0-15 or so. Here the question is "if you package unreleased changes, should they go to orig.tar or to debian.tar, am I right? > That's what I just saw on debian-devel-changes: > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 04:48:47PM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > [...] > > Changes: > > gcc-5 (5.3.1-21) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > * GCC 5.4.0 release candidate 1. [...] > A 5.4.0 rc1 in a package versioned 5.3.1-21? [...] > Package versions should actually tell the correct version... Here the question is "should the package upstream version be the same as what the software reports/written in version.h", am I right? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature