[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs



On Fri, 06 May 2016, Tormod Volden wrote:
> PS. I didn't think about it initially, but I guess "NACK" means
> "thanks for your patch and your interest in the developer reference,
> but I don't think this is the best solution."

That's pretty much correct, yes.

NACK in this context implies that whatever you proposed was carefully
considered by the person "NACK'ing" it, and then rejected.  An explanation
for the rejection should be provided along with the "NACK".

It is very common lingo on Linux-releated FLOSS development mailing lists,
when rejecting a changes proposal (patch), etc.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


Reply to: