Re: Question regarding policy (11.2)
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:38:57AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> b) I didn't respond to it, I responded to emails that seemed to
> seriously be advocating doubling the number of -dev packages in
> debian. In particular, I responded to this statement by Jamin W.
> Collins:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:22:38PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > Err, sorry. I was under the impression that Jamin supported moving
> > > *all* static libraries to separate packages (the "worst case" scenario
> > > as James said). Maybe I misunderstood him.
> >
> > I do support such a move. It increases the options available.
Fair enough.
It is also worth noting that (to my knowledge) Jamin Collins is not a
developer and is not actually able to make changes to policy.
So, I think people should pay attention to actual proposals, rather than
paying attention to various musings. In this case, one such post detracted
you from seconding/objecting to...
> Anyway this thread is going nowhere, why don't you make a concrete
> formal policy proposal or something.
...the formal policy proposal which I submitted near the beginning of the
thread, in Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030206105016.GD1901@cibalia.gkvk.hr>.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: