On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 10:44:15AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > Hmm, 30 points is a lot. That would mean that a netwm-compliant > window manager which didn't support the Debian menu system would rank > higher than a non-netwm system which did. I'm not sure I'm willing to > go that far. Me neither. > I definitely have mixed feelings about this whole thing. I'd like > gnome to work hassle-free out of the box, but I'd also like to have > the *best* window manager be default, even for our users that don't > use gnome. I think that a "netwm" alternative might actually be the > best approach all around, even if it is a little more complicated. I am tempted to agree. > (I still want to hear what Branden has to say about all of this, too.) I haven't firmly made up my mind yet. Can someone tell me what the relationship between WMSP, "netwm", and the EWMH spec is? -- G. Branden Robinson | Religion is regarded by the common Debian GNU/Linux | people as true, by the wise as branden@debian.org | false, and by the rulers as useful. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Attachment:
pgpOLs59NN4g0.pgp
Description: PGP signature