Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr

[Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>]

>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:

 Clint> Are you suggesting that Debian support this extension, or a subset
 Clint> thereof?

	Ah. Before I provide my impramatur of approval over words that
 shall be writ in stone, are there any shells that have POSIX+XSI
 extensions+UP-in-interactive-mode? If so, this could be a useful
 criteria. If there are no such shells, well, we live with what we
 have, and reassess when POSIX compliance is reached.

	Writing in stone the current state of the shells at hand, ad
 updating the stone tablet from release to release of each of the
 candidate shells is not what I wish to do.

	manoj
-- 
 Take your work seriously but never take yourself seriously; and do
 not take what happens either to yourself or your work
 seriously. Booth Tarkington
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org