Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:
>> Codify what, please? I personally use which, since it is
>> provided by am essential package, and I can live with it eing an
>> external program, and missing aliases. People can also use POSIX type
Clint> You don't have that with zsh, since which is a builtin.
I don't have what? which is present, either as a builtin, or
provided by an essential package. What exactly do I not have?
>> (umm, does zsh have type?). Why does this have to be codified? When
Clint> zsh has type as a builtin, though it isn't POSIX either.
Oh? How is it not POSIX?
>> do we want to stop codifying every little thing?
Clint> When there are no more problems?
Then we should stop right here, since that is an impossible goal.
Clint> There are numerous #!/bin/sh scripts in Debian that are not
Clint> POSIX-compliant. One might get the idea, if one were to read
Clint> Debian's policy documents, that these scripts violate Policy.
Yes. File bugs.
Clint> One might also get the idea, if one were to read the same
Clint> section, that one could install a POSIX-compliant shell as
Clint> /bin/sh on one's Debian system, and that one would experience
Clint> no difficulties in doing so. Of course, this is a fallacy.
File bugs. fix things. More documents saying this is wrong
does not fix any bugs. Policy already talks about POSIX /bin/sh, yet
another document just adds to the ossification, and solves nothing.
Clint> And not doing so invites unexpected behaviors.
Yeah, lefe sucvks, doesn't it? And damn Heisenburg.
manoj
--
"You shouldn't make my toaster angry." Household security explained
in "Johnny Quest"
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>