Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:
>> So why are you putting something in roots path ahead of the
>> standard path unless you want it to be run?
Clint> Under what circumstances? In which context? root has different paths
Clint> at different times.
Are you being delibrately obtuse? Is this soem arcane
debating ploy? Or have you suddenly developed amnesia and no longer
remember the context this discussion is taking place in?
>> I think that is a bug.
Clint> I think that is a feature.
I have shown in a companion message why this should be
considered a bug.
manoj
--
If your lover doesn't like garlic, get a new lover. Jeff Smith, The
Frugal Gourmet
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>