Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
> Notice "or some other nice English word"... when the admin puts binaries in
> a $PATH, they need to be aware of the consequences. If they put something in
> a place where it can replace a Debian binary, how do we know it's
Why would someone, being told that '/usr/local is for the administrator;
Debian doesn't touch it' assume that package scripts will go around
running things in /usr/local?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>