Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:53:50PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 01:48:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Documentation good. Ad hockery bad.
> That's your opinion, not mine, and not the word of God that you make it
> out to be.
Sorry Anthony, but are you really telling us that in your
opinion not documenting technical things should be prefered
to documenting them?
Confused,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
Attachment:
pgpFkZ5w5D3wG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@progeny.com>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>