Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
>>"Jochen" == Jochen Voss <jvoss2@web.de> writes:
Jochen> Sorry Anthony, but are you really telling us that in your
Jochen> opinion not documenting technical things should be prefered
Jochen> to documenting them?
Having an explicit, separate documentation of technical things
that has to be maintained, or else it slips out of synchronization
with reality, is certainly not to be preferred to haveing a
deterministic way of inferring such information.
In other words, Branden's simple shell snippet is the
documented list. I seem to be missing the reason why that is not good
enough.
manoj
fluid and organic
--
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of
car payments. Earl Wilson
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@progeny.com>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: RFD: Essential packages, /, and /usr
- From: Jochen Voss <jvoss2@web.de>