Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Wichert> Previously Josip Rodin wrote:
>> 25 Nov 1996 Removed editor (should have done this a long time ago)
Wichert> Does anyone remember the rationale for that?
Well, 4.5 years is a long time, but I suspect that
sensible-editor mechanism was supposed to be the way to go. Since
packages already manipulate the sensible editor link, and there
always is supposed to be one, perhaps t was thought that editor
virtual package was redundant?
Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good;
and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. Dick Brandon
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C