[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

"Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?


 The section:

       <sect><heading>Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering

 in particular the paragraph:

           Therefore a dependency on a virtual package should contain a
           concrete package name as the first alternative, so that this
           is the default.

 seems to be missing from policy (it existed in the packaging manual).
 Is this intentional?  The only similar paragraph I can find is:

      If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be
      the default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual
      package, you should list the real package as an alternative before
      the virtual.

 but needless to say, this doesn't have the same effect.


Marcelo             | No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness
mmagallo@debian.org | has always got there first, and is waiting for it.
                    |         -- (Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man)

Reply to: