Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:25:30PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Well, because it's useless? A vast majority of packages depend on an editor,
> > anyway.
> I don't see why it's useless.
It's useless to have a virtual package that thousands of packages would have
to have a dependency on, it's too much work for too little gain. Cf.
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification