[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included



On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:45:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com> writes:
> > Where in the GPL does it make a distinction??
> The GPL speaks of what you distribute.  When you put a bunch of pieces
> up on a web site, the question of whether you intend to distribute
> the pieces or only the combined whole is a question of what your
> intention is.  One indication of Debian's intention is that it
> advertises individual .debs for download.

Which are intended to update an existing Debian system (hence the
instructions to run "dpkg -i", eg). That is, they're intended for people
to whom we've already distributed an entire system, including the GPL.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
                       -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001

Attachment: pgp_UgI80cYS2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: