Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote: > However, there is nothing in here that is policy: to do > otherwise would not work, and the paclage would break. I think we > need to remove the aspects of the packaging manual that are merely > documentation for dpkg out of the policy; just standard API's that > packages need to depend on (the version numbering is the most > important part that comes to mind). I'll try and get working on > slimming the packaging manual down, and separate the package building > tutorial aspects out of the policy package. Thanks, that would be very much appreciated. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpEK_Zc2OjhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature