Re: identical extended descriptions
Chris Waters wrote:
> I'd rather see 'em judged on a case-by-case basis than have 200
> mechanically generated reports sent out blind.
Did i ever say I was going to send out automated bug reports?
> Although I do suspect that a careful inspection of package
> descriptions would result in well more than 200 cases where a bug
> report would be appropriate...the problem is by no means just limited
> to dups. Terse and uninformative descriptions are all-too-common.
> But finding them all is not something a script can really do.
So since I cannot fix everything perfectly, I should not even try. I see.
see shy jo