Re: identical extended descriptions
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Yes, it is a 5 word change in the Control file. Do you feel it
> is worth it? I don't thik it makes a meaningful distinction (It'll
> fool the md5sum check, though ;-).
Heh. It wouldn't hurt, but it doesn't really matter.
> Joey> Maybe we don't need an amendment at all, since many of these
> Joey> packages could be said to be volating policy by not having a
> Joey> description that "tells the user what they need to know to
> Joey> decide whether to install the package".
>
> Sounds a fair statement to me.
Unless someone disagrees, I'll file 200 or so bug reports a few days from
now.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: