Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> And, gee, shock horror, I'll say the exact same thing I said last time
> you mentioned this, and that is that it's much more alike things that
> -policy discusses that things the packaging-manual discusses.
Yes, I remember. I thought you were suggesting that we move both
paragraphs to the packaging manual. If not, then I so suggest. Makes
a lot more sense that sticking more stuff in policy that doesn't
belong there just because there's a little bit of stuff that doesn't
belong there already.
Lets make the situation better, not worse.
Chris Waters email@example.com | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or firstname.lastname@example.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.