[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> And, gee, shock horror, I'll say the exact same thing I said last time
> you mentioned this, and that is that it's much more alike things that
> -policy discusses that things the packaging-manual discusses.

Yes, I remember.  I thought you were suggesting that we move both
paragraphs to the packaging manual.  If not, then I so suggest.  Makes
a lot more sense that sticking more stuff in policy that doesn't
belong there just because there's a little bit of stuff that doesn't
belong there already.

Lets make the situation better, not worse.
Chris Waters   xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
      or    xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr     | this .signature file.

Reply to: