debian-policy Dec 1999 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Oliver Elphick
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
James Deikun
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
liblockdev
Daniel Quinlan
Re: liblockdev
Fabrizio Polacco
RE: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main
Ronald van Loon
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main
John Lines
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy
Moray Allan
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Joey Hess
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Darren O. Benham
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Joey Hess
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Darren O. Benham
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Joey Hess
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Chris Waters
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Joey Hess
a nitpicky reading of policy
Joey Hess
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Branden Robinson
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Falk Hueffner
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Raul Miller
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Raul Miller
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Julian Gilbey
Move TeX from Standard (was: a nitpicky reading of policy)
Edward Betts
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Joey Hess
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Raul Miller
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joseph Carter
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Raul Miller
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Branden Robinson
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group
Zed Pobre
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group
Branden Robinson
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Raul Miller
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Franklin Belew
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Franklin Belew
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Bob Hilliard
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Joey Hess
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Zed Pobre
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group
Mark Baker
Re: ICCCM compliance?
Michael Jennings
Re: ICCCM compliance?
Brian May
Re: ICCCM compliance?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information.
Ivan Baldo
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information.
Julian Gilbey
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information.
Ivan Baldo
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information.
Ben Collins
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information.
Julian Gilbey
The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Raul Miller
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Nils Jeppe
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Raul Miller
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Brian May
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Branden Robinson
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Joel Klecker
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Joseph Carter
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ]
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Manoj Srivastava
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Bruce Perens
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
copyright file problems
Gergely Madarasz
Re: copyright file problems
Peter S Galbraith
Re: copyright file problems
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: copyright file problems
Anthony Towns
Re: copyright file problems
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Redundant code for non-us?
Peter S Galbraith
weekly policy summary
Joey Hess
Re: weekly policy summary
Branden Robinson
Re: weekly policy summary
Joey Hess
Re: weekly policy summary
Joseph Carter
Bug#46522: weekly policy summary
Anthony Towns
Bug#46522: weekly policy summary
Raul Miller
Re: weekly policy summary
Anthony Towns
Re: weekly policy summary
Anthony Towns
Re: weekly policy summary
Anthony Towns
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary
Anthony Towns
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary
Bob Hilliard
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary
Joey Hess
<Possible follow-ups>
weekly policy summary
Joey Hess
[nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due
Nathan O. Siemers
Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due
Chris Waters
Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due
Nathan O. Siemers
Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due
Seth R Arnold
Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due
Nathan O. Siemers
Package without build-deps (was: Installed hello 1.3-16)
Edward Betts
Re: Package without build-deps (was: Installed hello 1.3-16)
Zed Pobre
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Raul Miller
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Seth R Arnold
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Ben Collins
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#52225: policy typo
Peter Naulls
Bug#52225: policy typo
Raul Miller
Bug#52225: policy typo
Julian Gilbey
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Julian Gilbey
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Ben Collins
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Ben Collins
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Julian Gilbey
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Ben Collins
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Andrew Pimlott
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Ben Collins
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Julian Gilbey
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)
Andrew Pimlott
Shared libs in non-standard locations
Franklin Belew
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Julian Gilbey
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Darren Benham
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Julian Gilbey
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Julian Gilbey
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Darren
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Raul Miller
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations
Joel Klecker
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Julian Gilbey
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: recommends/suggests patch
Joey Hess
Re: recommends/suggests patch
Richard Braakman
Re: webmin license
John Galt
Re: webmin license
Gergely Madarasz
Re: webmin license
Henning Makholm
[Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>] Re: [configure: feature request] Support configuration like `i386-linux'.
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: [Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>] Re: [configure: feature request] Support configuration like `i386-linux'.
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: Bug#53054: pygresql: change version number to reflect correct upstream version
Oliver Elphick
Re: Bug#53054: pygresql: change version number to reflect correct upstream version
Gergely Madarasz
Re: Bug#53054: pygresql: change version number to reflect correct upstream version
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Greg Stark
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Michael Alan Dorman
Re: [configure: feature request] Support configuration like `i386-linux'.
Karl M. Hegbloom
`dhelp' documentation heirarchy
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: base dependency warning
Yann Dirson
Re: base dependency warning
Joey Hess
Re: base dependency warning
Joseph Carter
Re: base dependency warning
Joey Hess
Re: base dependency warning
Joseph Carter
Re: base dependency warning
Taketoshi Sano
Re: base dependency warning
Adam Di Carlo
Re: base dependency warning
Joey Hess
Re: base dependency warning
Adam Di Carlo
Re: base dependency warning
Taketoshi Sano
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: base dependency warning
Julian Gilbey
CVS commit messages
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: Add "and others" to author of packaging manual.
debian-policy
Bug#53405: packaging-manual: dpkg 1.6.5 will reorder symlinks for you
Wichert Akkerman
["Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>] Re: [configure: feature request] Support configuration like `i386-linux'.
Karl M. Hegbloom
Bug#53496: some details wrong in Policy section 3.2.
Josip Rodin
Bug#53700: bogosity in editor/pager discussion
Ben Harris
Bug#53756: [PROPOSED] additions to virtual package list
Branden Robinson
Bug#53758: [PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative
Branden Robinson
Bug#53757: [PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative
Branden Robinson
Bug#53757: PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative
Martin Schulze
Bug#53757: PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative
Branden Robinson
Bug#53759: [PROPOSED] revision of the "to build with X support or not" policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#53760: [PROPOSED] revision of X application-defaults policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#53761: [PROPOSED] revision of the Motif/LessTif policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#53761: PROPOSED] revision of the Motif/LessTif policy
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Bug#53762: [PROPOSED] applying the FHS to packages that use X
Branden Robinson
Bug#53763: [PROPOSED] policy for X font packages
Branden Robinson
Bug#53755: [PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative
Branden Robinson
Bug#53755: PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative
Martin Schulze
Bug#53755: PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative
Branden Robinson
The last update was on 08:01 GMT Sat May 11. There are 259 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc