Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <email@example.com> writes:
Raul> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:19:57AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
>> I can't think of anything to add to that. Except to comment that it
>> might be rather difficult to document samba if you could never refer
>> to non-free software. :-)
Raul> You're suggesting you don't recognize the difference between package
Raul> structure and documentation?
I would suggest that ethically speaking (and we do seem to be
speaking of ethics and religion), if the package talks all about
non-free packages in the description and all over the docs, your poor
users are going to be made way more aware of the bad, nast6y non-free
software that is not supposed to exist.
Nothing succeeds like success. Alexandre Dumas
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E