[debian-x readers, please direct followups to debian-policy]
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 11:01:24AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Previously Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Well, maybe. They are, indeed, written as C include files, but that
> > > does not make them C include files: programs do not tend to say things
> > > like:
> >
> > I've seen lots and lots of programs that do exactly that and I would be
> > unpleasantly surprised if they suddenly broke.
> >
> > Wichert.
>
> Fair enough. As someone then (almost) suggested, have
> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/{pix,bit}maps both be symlinks to
> /usr/share/icons and keep all icons there.
I'm amendable to this.
> Alternatively, use the second option: allow icons to live in both
> the /usr/X11R6/include/X11/{pix,bit}maps directories and
> /usr/share/icons.
>
> What does Branden think?
I don't like duplication if we can avoid it.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | The noble soul has reverence for itself.
branden@ecn.purdue.edu | -- Friedrich Nietzsche
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpI2dS3yE5UN.pgp
Description: PGP signature