[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: consensus on debug (-g) policy



On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 11:15:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         I can spot atleast a dozen spots where a general stement like
>  this can be stuck into the policy document. However, exhorting people
>  to read documentation about optrional helper packages seems like
>  needless bloat of the policy documents to me.
> 
>         As I said elsewhere, please create a separate proposal for
>  this paragraph, if you feel strongly about this. This is
>  controversial, the rest of your proposal is not, and is technically
>  quite sound (IMHO). Let us not drag the rest of the proposal into
>  this quagmire, since we do not have to.

Well, I didn't realize this was such a touchy subject as I don't usually
read a lot of -policy. To avoid any problems with this proposal, I'll drop
that section in favor of your last post.

Also, thanks for correcting the bug status.

Ben


Reply to: