Re: consensus on debug (-g) policy
On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 11:15:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I can spot atleast a dozen spots where a general stement like
> this can be stuck into the policy document. However, exhorting people
> to read documentation about optrional helper packages seems like
> needless bloat of the policy documents to me.
>
> As I said elsewhere, please create a separate proposal for
> this paragraph, if you feel strongly about this. This is
> controversial, the rest of your proposal is not, and is technically
> quite sound (IMHO). Let us not drag the rest of the proposal into
> this quagmire, since we do not have to.
Well, I didn't realize this was such a touchy subject as I don't usually
read a lot of -policy. To avoid any problems with this proposal, I'll drop
that section in favor of your last post.
Also, thanks for correcting the bug status.
Ben
Reply to: