Re: Software in main that is throughly useless without non-free software
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:
>
> > > Well there's an obvious discrepancy then, since MANY other programs in
> > > the same boat are already in main, and have been for some time.
> >
> > Yes, because I didn't accept them. This thread only started because I
> > happened to look at TiK while processing Incoming. I am *not* picking
> > on TiK here. As I've already said, and I'll thank you kindly to stop
> > trolling that I am.
>
> I'm not trying to troll here. I'm just pointing out that there is a
> glaring inconsistency in the treatment of packages.
*sigh*. No, there is not. I did not accept the other packages. I am
being perfectly consistent. This is the first package that I have
review from Incoming of this sort; that's all, nothing more, nothing
less.
--
James
Reply to: