[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?

On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 05:42:19PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 01:08:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > How about using "Builder:"?  It means the same thing and is more
> > graceful-looking than "Compiled-by:".
> How about "Compiler: "? 
> :-)

After that I would expect to see "egcs", "gcc", "gnat", etc.  "Builder", in
my opinion, has a more anthropic ring to it.

G. Branden Robinson              |
Debian GNU/Linux                 |   Exercise your freedom of religion.  Set
branden@ecn.purdue.edu           |   fire to a church of your choice.
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgph7nBpskJjb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: