[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?

Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
> No, it shouldn't.  There should possibly be a new field, but
> Maintainer is for the maintainer.

A Compiled-by: field would be useful. You can also use that to track
down who compiled the package for another architecture. I also still
think the Maintainer: entry in a .changes file should be renamed..


This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgp4EabNBy_C3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: