Re: Documentation license problem solved: OpenContent License (OPL)
>>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
Ben> I think our ongoing problem of finding an appropriate license
Ben> for documentation has been solved.
Ben>
Ben> On slashdot.org today, an article about the OpenContent
Ben> License (OPL, pronounced 'opal') was posted.
Marcus> this really does surprise me now, as I've more or less
Marcus> been appointed (there were no objections) to be the
Marcus> official contact person for Debian to the OpenContent
Marcus> group. Please read in debian-private archive, starting
Marcus> from message
You're right. I'm sorry, I guess I missed the old discussion. :)
*snip excellent discussion*
Marcus> To put a long remark short: The contact to OpneContent is
Marcus> already build up and active, and as soon as something
Marcus> remarkable comes out of it, I'll let all of you know.
Okay. Thank you for setting the matter clear, Marcus. :)
Ben
--
Brought to you by the letters F and A and the number 13.
"It is sad. *Campers* cannot *dance*. Not even a *party*." -- Orz, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: