Re: Documentation license problem solved: OpenContent License (OPL)
Hi!
>>>>> Jens Ritter writes:
>> [...] You may not charge a fee for the OC itself.
JR> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JR> As I understand it, GPL does not put this restriction on the
JR> content it licenses.
That's one of the points I missed. Thanks for reading the fine
print.
JR> GPL applied to documentation ensures the content is free, or
JR> doesn't it?
Yes, it does.
JR> What`s the point with another license?
It makes the intent of the author more obvious, for those who don't
think about the full implications of the GPL.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@fig.org> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
Copyright (C) 1998 FIG.org; the creator offers you this gift and wants it
to remain free. See http://www.fig.org/freedom.html for details.
This work may be copied, modified and distributed under the GNU General
Public License (GPL). See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html.
Reply to: