Re: Chosing release goals for slink
Martin Mitchell <martin@debian.org> writes:
> * Developer controlled automatic archive maintenance (eg removal of
> packages automatically after GPG signed email with list of
> packages to delete)
I think this idea, as presented here, is very bad. Even with sanity
checks and more thought, I'm not impressed by the idea and don't think
it would be worth the effort to implement. We now have people helping
Guy, and the ftp site should be much less of a problem than it has
been recently.
> * Autocompilation support
Eh? That sounds suspiciously like meaningless buzz-word talk. What's
``autocompilation support'' please?
> That's all that comes to mind right now, any other suggestions?
That we release slink before 2038 or so? These goals (the desirable
ones, that is) aren't viable if we want slink to not be the disaster
hamm is.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://yawn.nocrew.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: