Chosing release goals for slink
Maybe some will think it's not yet time to discuss this, but I think
we need a central repository for ideas of what the release goals for
slink will be.
The following list is only built from what I remember to have read at
some point, so it will need surely some additions. I also add some
items which have surely not been discussed in length, but will
certainly need to before selecting them or not. Let's hope it can
serve as a base to select which ones we'll implement.
* FHS compliance
* PAM support
* docbase support
* No binary-section manpages (mainly 1, 6, 8) in `manpages' and
`manpages-<LANG>' packages, but in their relevant binary packages.
* DTM support (Definitive Type Manager, formerly Debian Type Manager)
- Federico: do you think it's feasible ?
* Others ?
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@mygale.org> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email: <ydirson@a2points.com> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: