Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles?

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles?
From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@feedback.net.ar>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 21:19:28 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 19971219211928.07700@newton>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.971219115630.738A-100000@cantor.unex.es>; from Santiago Vila on Fri, Dec 19, 1997 at 12:05:11PM +0100
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.971219115630.738A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

> Could somebody please explain the rationale for having *all*
> /etc/init.d/* scripts as conffiles?

 They are as conffiles as autoexec.bat in DOS is.

 (uh.. was that good English?)

Reply to:

References:
- Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?
Next by Date: Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?
Previous by thread: Re: Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles?
Next by thread: policy on g appended to lib names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread