policy on g appended to lib names
As I've seen bugs raised against packages that added the g _after_ the
soname in the package name instead than _between_ the name and the
soname, I ask:
- didn't we agree that would be better to add the "g" after the
soname like lib0g instead than libg0, to avoid confusion with
lib names already ending in g?
- didn't we agree that anyway this wasn't worth to be changed for
packages already present in the distribution, as it would be a mess?
Thank you,
Fabrizio
--
| fpolacco@icenet.fi fpolacco@debian.org fpolacco@pluto.linux.it
| Pluto Leader - Debian Developer & Happy Debian 1.3.1 User - vi-holic
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
Reply to: