[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Rationale for /etc/init.d/* being conffiles?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

This came from bug #16058.

Policy Manual 3.4.5 says:

   Do not include the /etc/rcn.d/* symbolic links in dpkg's conffiles
   list! This will cause problems! Do, however, include the /etc/init.d
   scripts in conffiles.

However, it does not say why /etc/init.d/* scripts have to be conffiles.
They are usually programs, not configuration files.

Could somebody please explain the rationale for having *all*
/etc/init.d/* scripts as conffiles?

Please, don't say "you can deactivate the service by modifying the
scripts", since we already can deactivate the service by uninstalling the
package, and the *real* configuration files will remember how exactly do
we want the services to be activated again when we install the package
again.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNJpU2SqK7IlOjMLFAQFtRAP8Dm6mmqjduEMm8CLiFSkzp8INCX6Adq+2
TTUJLJMsupwe68E4kQvPtQd0FMC7CUgcQ+i8ZLZlxpsSjjLsH//KV70AZT5JpSaP
4qPosJgJ8r0irJcCVQqRSOa2HeT9/Ubzkv/gOwuS5z9tM5QoCxFf204TcsREMv1f
igD8pIgXGG8=
=DCqr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: