gregor herrmann: > So now we have > > group perl-team: owners Dom ntyni and me > subgroup interpreter: owners (explicitly set) Dom and ntyni > subgroup modules: owners (explicitly set) Dom ntyni me and carnil [0] > subgroup packages: inherited members > subgroup attic: inherited members Looks good to me too. I'm just wondering if subgroup "projects" would fit better the purpose of not-interpreter subgroup while being more inclusive as a description, i.e. perl projects. Cheers! Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature