Re: Alioth → Salsa
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, 25.01.2018 21:22:00 +0000 |=-
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:04:59PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > On Thu 2018-01-25 21:58:35 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > >> * Team name
> > >> - we need a team
> > >> + name? '-team' will be appended
> > >
> > > pkg-perl-team?
> > > perl-team?
> > > debian-perl-team?
> > > pkg-perl? (We'd need to ask for it)
> > i'm inactive enough on this team that you should let other people's
> > preferences override mine. But my understanding is that the expected
> > convention is perl-team, and i think that's good. shorter == better.
> There's a bit of a conflict here because there is also the "perl" group
> on alioth which is separate from "pkg-perl". This is dedicated to
> maintenance of the interpreter, and should probably stay separate.
> But as long as this is coordinated I don't see a big problem.
Would there be any problem if we use the same team name?
This can fit in the sub-projects gregor writes about, perhaps with
renaming 'packages' to 'modules'.
*If* we choose to use one salsa team for both modules and the
interpreter, then the name naturally comes as 'perl-team', right?
> How about: perl-modules-team and perl-interpreter-team?
Here's another alternative: libperl-team (to match the package naming
I have created a poll:
Maybe it can help.