On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:34:40 +0000, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Dominic Hargreaves, 25.01.2018 21:22:00 +0000 |=- > > There's a bit of a conflict here because there is also the "perl" group > > on alioth which is separate from "pkg-perl". This is dedicated to > > maintenance of the interpreter, and should probably stay separate. > > But as long as this is coordinated I don't see a big problem. > > Would there be any problem if we use the same team name? > > This can fit in the sub-projects gregor writes about, perhaps with > renaming 'packages' to 'modules'. > *If* we choose to use one salsa team for both modules and the > interpreter, then the name naturally comes as 'perl-team', right? Makes sense to me. But that's Niko's and Dom's call, and I'm completly fine either way. > > How about: perl-modules-team and perl-interpreter-team? > Here's another alternative: libperl-team (to match the package naming > scheme). Also nice :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Leonard Cohen: Diamonds In The Mine
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature