-=| Axel Beckert, 01.06.2014 23:45:05 +0200 |=- > gregor herrmann wrote: > > I still think that it would be nice to have a standard set of > > tests > > in a separate package instead of spelling them out in each individual > > package. Cf. the thread starting at > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2013/12/msg00064.html > > Definitely. And the tests I wrote are generic enough to be a base for > such tests, at least for some subset of our packages. (The adequate > test is definitely generic enough to be suited for nearly any package. > See the discussion about some potential caveats in > https://bugs.debian.org/743198) > > I think the XS-Testsuite header is the key there. If we don't specify > "autopkgtest" there, but let's say "pkg-perl-test-prove-without-lib". > And potential package could contain the test suite for all pkg-perl > packages which don't use "use lib" in their test-suite and can be run > with "prove". What's the problem with 'use lib'? If it is tainting the test environment, that's easy to fix. Copy t/ in to a temporary directory, chdir there and run prove -v. Wouldn't that work regardless of 'use lib'? -- dam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature