package: piuparts-master severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: email@example.com Hi Axel, On Freitag, 29. August 2014, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to > > > appear yet: E.g. > > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_lib > > > rary _inadequate_issue.html lists cifs-utils, but neither > > > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cifs-utils.html says anything > > > about this issue nor does > > > https://firstname.lastname@example.org > > > th.d ebian.org.html > > > > > > So the situation there is definitely suboptimal. Cc'ing the Piuparts > > > Developers for further input on this. > > > > do you think that bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library should > > cause a piuparts test failure? IOW: does it at least warrant important > > bugs, maybe even serious ones? > > No, my intention is a different one: Piuparts should list all adequate > issues on the per-package or per-maintainer to make the maintainers > aware of these issues. Because that's where the maintainers look for > their packages. (In addition it would get even more attention if the > PTS or the new tracker would list them on the package page.) I agree, thus I'm submitting this bug... Thanks! :) > Otherwise it can't replace running adequate in autopkgtest tests. That should indeed happen, as not all packages have autopkgtests... cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.