Hi Axel, On Freitag, 29. August 2014, Axel Beckert wrote: > But then again, adequate warnings don't count as "fail" in piuparts. > Look for "but adequate" on e.g. https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/ thats currently correct, as all the severe issues adequate detects are also detected by piuparts anyway... > And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to > appear yet: E.g. > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library > _inadequate_issue.html lists cifs-utils, but neither > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cifs-utils.html says anything > about this issue nor does > https://email@example.com > ebian.org.html > > So the situation there is definitely suboptimal. Cc'ing the Piuparts > Developers for further input on this. do you think that bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library should cause a piuparts test failure? IOW: does it at least warrant important bugs, maybe even serious ones? cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.