On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:59:48 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > > libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl >= y > > > libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl << 5.20 > > Ah, right, thanks for refreshing my memory > > This still leaves the questions if > > - cme can create something like this, and > yes. That does not mean it's a good idea Agreed. > > - if we would want it instead of an unconditional > > libmodules-build-perl >= x > It is much simpler to handle for us and dpkg resolver. Jonas' trick will > probably trigger questions from perl packagers (present and futures) *nod* > The only drawback I see: some systems may needlessly install modules when > installing backported perl packages. > Is that a big deal ? I don't think so, especially since this is, in the case of Module::Build, only for the build in most cases. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Beatles
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature