On Sunday 01 June 2014 19:10:48 gregor herrmann wrote: > > By resolving that paranthesis into two separate statements: > > > > > > libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl >= y > > libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl << 5.20 > > Ah, right, thanks for refreshing my memory > > This still leaves the questions if > - cme can create something like this, and yes. That does not mean it's a good idea > - if we would want it instead of an unconditional > libmodules-build-perl >= x It is much simpler to handle for us and dpkg resolver. Jonas' trick will probably trigger questions from perl packagers (present and futures) The only drawback I see: some systems may needlessly install modules when installing backported perl packages. Is that a big deal ? HTH -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.