[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Challenges around Perl 5.20



On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:22:03 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> > On Wed, 28 May 2014 09:41:54 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > > I don't think that Config::Model::Dpkg::Dependency will correctly detect that 
> > > Module::Build was removed from corelist.
> > I guess so as well.
> > And even if it would, I'm no sure how to express a Dependency like
> > libmodules-build-perl >= x OR ( perl >= y AND perl << 5.20 )
> By resolving that paranthesis into two separate statements:
> 
> libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl >= y 
> libmodules-build-perl >= x | perl << 5.20

Ah, right, thanks for refreshing my memory :)

This still leaves the questions if
- cme can create something like this, and
- if we would want it instead of an unconditional
  libmodules-build-perl >= x


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Ludwig Hirsch: Der Turm

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature


Reply to: