Re: Bug#608583: Removing RC buggy leaf packages with low popularity?
Niko Tyni wrote:
[http://bugs.debian.org/608583 -- No more upstream for Net::IRC]
> Axel, given that you care and current upstream clearly doesn't, how
> about taking over the upstream maintenance?
I already though about that, yes -- and not only once. I also thought
about adding myself as Uploader to the libnet-irc-perl package.
But I think my lack of knowledge about the IRC protocol does not
enable me to maintain it properly as upstream.
And since I already converted the one place where I need a Perl IRC
library, I don't care as much anymore as the frustration about the
whole issue may have suggested.
As I said, I'm sad that we discuss such things now and not before I
was urged to move away to different libraries. But that's past. (Well,
the frustation is still there, but I won't go back and the frustration
hopefully will go away.)
So, I'm not vetoing against a removal of libnet-irc-perl, as I don't
see an alternative, but I'm still unhappy about ditching it.
,''`. | Axel Beckert <email@example.com>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5