On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:19:26 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> at the low-hanging fruits (LHF) session we just had, we've listed
> "our" RC buggy leaf packages (no reverse-dependency), and sorted this
> list by popcon ("installed") order.
Thanks alot to you and dam for pushing this and coming up with this
nice list!
> libnet-irc-perl [popcon: 386]
IIRC, this RC bug is a bit controversial -- Axel?
> libregexp-grammars-perl [popcon: 38]
IIRC, this is some nasty upstream bug where various people actively
work on it, which should be fixed in some future perl release. Carnil
might know more ...
(In general: adding "no upstream reaction" to the criteria would be
nice, albeit even more complicated ...)
> Do we want to remove the packages with popcon < N from the archive?
> How about N=50 or 100?
After looking at the list, N=50 sounds like a nice cutoff to me.
> As a side note, would anyone find it fun to automate building this
> list, and sending the results to the list e.g. every 2 or 3 months?
I'd have fun to see the output of the not-yet-written script :)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Pink Floyd: In the flesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature