[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Git migration update



On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:49:00PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:03:15 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> 
> > > I personally am very much found of option 2 too. However, while your 
> > > observations about difficulties with cherry-picking/backporting and 
> > > reverting are all true, they were also true in the SVN days, so we 
> > > don't really have a regression here.
> > Partially. I mean, you can't revert single commits with SVN like you can
> > do with git, hence you don't really notice it even if you commit to the
> > changelog for every change. I'm not really into SVN so I can't say what it 
> > can do or not, but the revert (as in git) functionality is something that I 
> > missed several times.
> 
> "svn merge -c-NNNNNN ." is similar to "git revert NNNNNNN".

SVN: 1
Me:  0

It seemed way too strange that such a feature wasn't present, and I 
discover this only now that I won't use subversion any more.

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'


Reply to: