-=| Charles Plessy, Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:07:51PM +0900 |=- > Le Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 07:57:00AM -0500, Jonathan Yu a écrit : > > > > Now, I realize Bioperl isn't a web app, but perhaps some similar > > arrangement where the /usr/bin programs are in bioperl, and the > > library is in libbio-perl? > > I was about to propose this as well, but I was afraid that people > would like it and I would have to do it ;) More seriously, this > would give bioperl a free trip to the NEW queue, but why not? > > Other opinions ? Is separate libbio-perl package useful? Is there any change that something else than bioperl will use it? If yes, split is justified, I think. If not, then leave it as it is.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature