-=| Jeremiah Foster, 9.08.2007 12:59 |=- > On Aug 9, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> OTOH, I wonder how bad would it be to have this package in pkg-perl? >> Yes, it does not fit into the declared goals, but how much a perl-based >> application is different to a perl module in regards to packaging? > > This is the part that I find a bit confusing frankly. I feel I don't > have the experience with packaging for debian to be able to add > constructively to the discussion at the moment. Hmm. If we take amavisd-ng as an example of a perl application, I thing this is better served by a dedicated, per-application team. So my opinion appears to be that applications are not an objective for the group. That said, File::Next is perfectly suitable. BTW amavisd-ng needs[1] co-maintainers if someone is interested. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/08/msg00437.html -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature