-=| gregor herrmann, 9.08.2007 01:28 |=- > Maybe there's some confusion about ack - is this a module or an > application? If we are talking about > http://search.cpan.org/~petdance/ack-1.64/Ack.pm (App::Ack) then > there's no question, I guess ;-) That one looks like a module that is only usable by the application. I would consider this module being part of the application (i.e. not deserving separate libapp-ack package etc). OTOH, I wonder how bad would it be to have this package in pkg-perl? Yes, it does not fit into the declared goals, but how much a perl-based application is different to a perl module in regards to packaging? It would be interesting to hear other's opinion about this. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature