-=| Julian Mehnle, 1.08.2007 13:44 |=- > I have objections to making it general policy of the DPG that the packaging > has to be listed in debian/copyright. This is unnecessary in general. > > Let's rather say that anyone who considers their own packaging work worthy > of copyright should add a stanza to debian/copyright themselves. I don't > think everyone else should be required to list the packaging in debian/ > copyright. IMHO, any work *may* fall under copyright. Whether it actually does probably depends on the jurisdiction, but adding explicit license makes all doubts disappear. This does not mean that I want to force all of you to add this, it means I feel uncomfortable about the missing packaging copyright in the packages I consider uploading. FWIW, this is already included in the dh_make templates. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature