gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:52:28 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > libemail-localdelivery-perl > > > > debian/copyright misses copyright for the packaging. Perhaps even > > mention DPG there? > > AFAIK there are a lot of packages without this notice. Is this > necessary nowadays? If not: I'm no a great fan of it because I don't > think that the "craft" of packaging something is worth to be > protected by copyright (or it's not even possible; Austrian law e.g. > demands a "Schöpfungshöhe" / "Threshold of Originality" and I don't > think that this demand is fulfilled by using dh-make-perl and dh_*) > [0] > > Anyway, I have no objections to adding such a stanza either ;-) I have objections to making it general policy of the DPG that the packaging has to be listed in debian/copyright. This is unnecessary in general. Let's rather say that anyone who considers their own packaging work worthy of copyright should add a stanza to debian/copyright themselves. I don't think everyone else should be required to list the packaging in debian/ copyright.
Attachment:
pgpLxc57PdZtV.pgp
Description: PGP signature