[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Orphaning my packages



gregor herrmann dijo [Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0200]:
> > Perl group: Since I was promoted by Joachim to a group admin, I have
> > added quite a few people, just answering to their comments that "they
> > want to join". Up to now, this has proved a good idea - Now, we are 39
> > members (plus the 3 admins? Or including? Don't know). Do you have any
> > comments on this? 
> 
> I appreciate your quick and uncomplicated approvals.
> 
> > I think we can still work on a basically open
> > membership basis, even if the active members are just a handful of
> > them. Do you agree?
> 
> Yup.

Ok, thanks!

> > BTW, yes, I still have not tackled the SVN reorganization... No time
> > yet :-/ but I'm not forgetting about it.
> 
> BTW:
> Could you include
> * libapache-request-perl (only old version in repo)
> * libcgi-safe-perl (example package)
> * libmail-audit-perl (relic)
> in the re-organization and move them to some archive/attic/whatever
> directory (cf. the discussion in early August) or should I do that
> before?

Whenever I get around to do this, I will do it over the whole SVN repo
as it is in that moment. Right now, having those three modules lying
around does not worry me too much - But anyway, we can create a
pkg-perl/attic directory, or (remember this is SVN, not CVS!) just do
a 'svn remove libapache-request-perl libcgi-safe-perl libmail-audit-perl'.
I agree they don't provide much value anymore.

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: